Judging something I do not utterly understand and palpably discern would be unfair. Therefore, it is better and more reasonable to refrain.
(Brillo 2024, 2025 [message/lecture])
Blogger: http://bbbrillo.blogspot.com
Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/bbbrillo
The litmus test for the academic preferment requirements is substantially and conspicuously satisfied. Foible shortcomings should be tolerated among the real world’s gatekeepers, since faultless tests only happen in an ideal world.
(Brillo 2024, 2025 [message/lecture])
Blogger: http://bbbrillo.blogspot.com
UP Scientist 2015-17, 2018-20, 2021-23, and 2024-26
One UP Professorial Chair 2016-18, 2019-21, 2022-24, and 2025-27
If you prefer a different perspective, that's okay, but you should provide a clear rationale and a strong justification. In other words, respectfully disagreeing should clearly explain (the reason) why you chose that approach and why your interpretation is acceptable.
Reasoning is more critical, especially when engaging with reasonable people.
(Brillo 2025 [message/lecture])
Blogger: http://bbbrillo.blogspot.com
From the printing press to the Internet and now to AI, there is no monopoly on knowledge—only dissemination and challenge.
(Brillo 2020, 2025 [message/lecture])
Blogger: http://bbbrillo.blogspot.com
Broadly, a particularly targeted approach is always better than a shotgun strategy.
Typically, a proactive response is consistently preferred over a reactive one.
(Brillo 2020, 2025 [message/lecture])
Blogger: http://bbbrillo.blogspot.com
Why Satisfying rather than Optimum— when interest and concern are less significant, then conserve the energy, time, and resources.
(Brillo 2021, 2025 [message/lecture])
Blogger: http://bbbrillo.blogspot.com
